I don't really know what to make of it. Wouldn't it be smarter not to use plastic at all?
Good points. I'd also imagine the mold costs will be very high and prohibit offering proper size options.
While mold costs could be high, per unit cost would be low. Payback would be quick.
Holland seems to be the target market so this would be a great product. Relatively flat terrain so weight is not an issue. Lots of rainy weather so it would not be prone to rust like the typical steel framed bicycle you see over there. Their bikes spend a lot of time sitting outside and being used in rainy weather. The drivetrain is also protected from the weather. They use bikes for transportation, not fast group rides so aerodynamics are a non-issue. Forget about any environmental justification. A plastic frame and rims would have a lot of benefits over there.
You won’t find carbon bicycles in getting much use in Holland. For some reason aluminum doesn’t seem to be favored either. They go for cheap, reliable, completely utilitarian transportation. They use bicycles like we use cars in the USA. No way to really compare bicycle usage here to there.
The problem I see with plastic is the stiffness. Can it be made rigid enough to not only withstand a normal ride, but will it take a set or start to warp over time. Plastic has creep issues. I think that one sided seat and chain stay arrangement may have some problems.
True. I'd imagine the stress points will need aluminum reinforcements internally.
Bicycle made of wood are also available!
Carbon bicycles are used by professional racing cyclists, very pricey.
Hobbyists have aluminum racing bicycle (also applies to mounting bikes). And people who tour a lot for fun usually do too.
In daily use, regular bicycles, steel frames are usually used. And abused ;)
A mix of various (expensive) bicycles, including wood, aluminum and steel. The aluminum version can usually be recognized by the thicker frame tubes. https://uniquebikes.com/modellen/
Titanium bicycles are also available: https://www.vannicholas.com
Most North American bike frame manufacturers are still using steel because they don't have the proper equipment to compete with Asian manufacturers. It's mostly due to the common use of aluminum hydroforming and the additional requirement of heat treating the frames back to T6 hardness after adjusting alignment, before paint.
Carbon tends to be expensive just because the market will support it. It can actually be the least expensive material.
Most road racing style bikes, including the cheapest ones, use a carbon front fork because that is the least expensive way to manufacture it. One piece near net shape in one operation vs a weldment of many different sub components that have already had multiple fabrication steps. I think the main reason you don’t see more carbon frames is they are so easily damaged and are nearly impossible to repair.
One of my road bikes is a hybrid carbon and aluminum construction. (They quit making those because of bonding issues between the dissimilar materials.) My other bikes are aluminum. High end bikes seem to be evenly split between aluminum and carbon. I don’t see even a niche market for plastic bicycles in the US except as merely toys. Steel is relegated to cheap department store brands in the US.
If you don't receive the email within an hour (and you've checked your Spam folder), email us as confirmation@grabcad.com.